I oppose a "permanent ceasefire" because I support a permanent ceasefire
Submitted March 16, 2024 to the Boston Globe:
To the editor:
I oppose a "permanent ceasefire" in Gaza because I support a permanent ceasefire there.
Any "permanent ceasefire" now would be no more permanent than the one in effect on the morning of October 7 until Hamas broke it, as it broke all previous ceasefires and will break any future ceasefires as long as it has not been effectively destroyed.
Calling for a ceasefire now may feel virtuous, but such a feeling is delusional. A ceasefire now would simply be a reward for Hamas and enable it to rearm, strengthen itself and when it feels ready perpetrate another bloody atrocity and start an even more violent war with more death and destruction.
If you really want to save lives, then help Israel destroy Hamas, free all the hostages not already murdered by Hamas, completely destroy all the rockets, tunnels and other terror infrastructure created by Hamas - largely using the aid foolishly sent by the international community - and de-Hamasify Gaza and the Palestinian Authority.
Only then will there be any reasonable hope for peace and prosperity in Gaza and the PA.
Sincerely,
Alan Stein
Comments
Post a Comment