The consequences of a ceasefire in Gaza

To the editor:

If a temporary ceasefire in Gaza is the price of the release of the Israelis and others kidnapped by Hamas and other terrorists during their October 7 Massacre, that would be a positive, but would be the only positive associated with a ceasefire.

The other consequences are all negative, indeed deadly. They include giving Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah and the other terror groups in Gaza a respite, a chance to regroup, rearm and strengthen themselves, lengthening the war and bringing more more misery, death and destruction to both Gazans and Israelis. It would almost certainly involve Israel freeing terrorists, many of whom will go back to murdering innocent people.

It would embolden Iran, the head of the snake, and terrorists around the globe.

Prolonging the war in Gaza would also prolong the displacement of people in Lebanon and northern Israel, forced from their homes by the attacks by Hezbollah, which has honored binding UN Security Council Resolution 1701 in the breach and now has an estimated 150,000 rockets aimed at Israel, located in homes, schools, mosques and hospitals in areas which UNIFIL was supposed to guarantee were free of any armed forces other than the Lebanese army (today effectively an arm of the Hezbollah terror group) and UNIFIL itself.

Well-meaning people, such as President Biden, should not be pushing for a ceasefire; rather, they should be applying pressure for the immediate and unconditional release of the hostages kidnapped by Gaza terrorists and the total and permanent defeat of those terrorist groups, as wisely recognized by President Biden shortly after the October 7 Massacre. Anything less presents a danger not just to Israel, but the entire democratic world and would be a victory for evil over good.

Sincerely,

Alan Stein

Sent to the Boston Globe February 27.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamas disarming? Get real.

Reporting on the wrong story in the wrong way

Give Israel the credit it deserves