Responding to the International (Kangaroo) Court of (In)Justice

This was sent to the Jerusalem Post on January 27 after the U(K)C(I)J irresponsibly failed to throw out the perverse case brought against Israel by South Africa, whose current government seems to be attempting to do the almost impossible and reach the level of immorality achieved by the former Apartheid government.

Letter to the editor: Responding to the ICJ

To the editor:

The following two paragraphs should comprise Israel's complete response in a month to the demands of the ICJ:

Although, as the court is undoubtedly aware, the charges against Israel filed by South Africa are baseless, beyond absurd and the court should have admitted that according to its own rules it did not have jurisdiction and, failing that, simply dismissed them out of hand, we will still provide the following report as unjustifiably demanded by the court.

As you are undoubtedly similarly aware, throughout the conflict started by the barbaric terrorists from Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah and supposedly ordinary civilians on October 7, Israel has done everything the court demands and did not do anything the court demands it not do, greatly exceeding the requirements under international law. Nothing has changed in this regard.

Sincerely,

Alan Stein

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamas disarming? Get real.

Reporting on the wrong story in the wrong way

Give Israel the credit it deserves